Bartolomé de las Casas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the 16th-century Spanish bishop of Chiapas, New Spain. For other uses of "Las Casas", see Las Casas (disambiguation).

Bartolomé de las Casas
Portrait of Bartolomé de las Casas
Born	c. 1484 Seville, Crown of Castille
Died	18 July 1566 (aged 81–82) Madrid, Spain
Nationality	Spanish
Occupation	Priest, writer, apologist
Title	Bishop of Chiapas; Attorney General and Universal Protector of the Indians
Religion	Roman Catholic
Relatives	Pedro de Las Casas (or Casaus) (father)
Signature

Bartolomé de las Casas O.P. (c. 1484^[1] – 18 July 1566) was a 16th-century Spanishhistorian, social reformer and Dominican friar. He became the first resident Bishop of Chiapas, and the first officially appointed "Protector of the Indians". His extensive writings, the most famous being "A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies" and "Historia de Las Indias", chronicle the first decades of colonization of the West Indies, focusing particularly on the atrocities committed by the colonizers against the Indigenous peoples.

Arriving as one of the first settlers in the New World he participated in, and was eventually compelled to oppose, the atrocities committed against the Native Americans by the Spanish colonists. In 1515 he changed his ways and gave up his own Indian slaves and encomienda, instead advocating before King Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor on behalf of rights for the natives. In 1522 he attempted to launch a new kind of peaceful colonialism on the coast ofVenezuela, but this venture failed causing Las Casas to enter the Dominican Order and become a monk, leaving the public scene for a decade. He then traveled to Central Americaundertaking peaceful evangelization among theMaya of Guatemala and participated in debates among the Mexican churchmen about how best to bring the natives to the Christian faith. Traveling back to Spain to recruit more missionaries he continued lobbying for the abolition of the encomienda, gaining an important victory by the passing of the New Laws in 1542. He was appointed Bishop ofChiapas, but served only for a short time before he was forced to return to Spain because of resistance to the New Laws by the encomenderos, and conflicts with Spanish settlers due to his pro-Indian policies and activist religious stances. The rest of his life he stayed at the Spanish court holding great influence over issues relating to the Indies. In 1550 he participated in the Valladolid debate, where he argued that the Indians were fully human and that forcefully subjugating them was unjustifiable, against Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda, who argued that they were less than human and required Spanish masters in order to acquire civilization.

Bartolomé de las Casas spent 50 years of his life actively fighting slavery and the violent colonial abuse of indigenous peoples, especially by trying to convince the Spanish court to adopt a more humane policy of colonization. And although he failed to save the indigenous peoples of the Western Indies, his efforts resulted in several improvements in the legal status of the natives, and in an increased colonial focus on the ethics of colonialism. Las Casas is often seen as one of the first advocates for universal Human Rights.^[2]

Contents [hide] 1 Life and times 1.1 Background and arrival in the New World 1.2 Conquest of Cuba and change of heart 1.3 Las Casas and King Ferdinand 1.4 Protector of the Indians 1.5 Las Casas and King Charles V: The peasant colonization scheme 1.6 The Cumaná venture 1.7 A Dominican friar 1.8 The New Laws 1.9 Bishop of Chiapas 1.10 The Valladolid Debates 1.11 Later years and death 2 Works 2.1 Memorial de Remedios para las Indias 2.2 A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies 2.3 Apologetic History of the Indies 2.4 History of the Indies 3 Las Casas in Posteriority 3.1 Critiques 3.2 Cultural legacy 4 Notes 5 References 6 External links

[edit]Life and times

[edit]Background and arrival in the New World

Depiction of Spanish atrocities committed in the conquest of Cuba in the 1552 edition of Las Casas "Brevisima relación de la destrucción de las Indias"

Bartolomé was born in Seville in the year 1474, probably on 16 November.^[3] Centuries of tradition had earlier placed Las Casas' birthdate in the year 1474. However, in the 1970s scholars conducting archival work demonstrated this to be an error, after uncovering in the Archivo General de Indiasrecords of a contemporary lawsuit that demonstrated he was born a decade later than had been supposed.^[4] Subsequent biographers and authors have generally accepted and reflected this revision.^[5] His father Pedro de las Casas was a merchant and the family descended from one of the families that had migrated from France to found the town of Seville, his family also spelled the name Casaus.^[6] According to one biographer his family were of conversoheritage,^[7] although others refer to them as ancient Christians who migrated from France.^[8]Following the testimony of Las Casas' biographer Antonio de Remesal tradition has it that Las Casas studied a licentiate at Salamanca, but this is never mentioned in Las Casas' own writings.^[9] As a teenager in 1507 he journeyed to Rome where he observed the Festval of Flutes.^[10]

With his father, Las Casas emigrated to the island of Hispaniola in 1502 on the expedition ofNicolás de Ovando. Las Casas became an agricultor and slave owner, receiving a piece of land in the province of Cibao.^[11] He participated in slave raids and military expeditions against the native Taíno population of Hispaniola.^[12] In 1510 he was ordained a priest, the first one to be ordained in the Americas.^[13][14]

In September 1510 a group of Dominican friars arrived in Santo Domingo led by Pedro de Córdoba, they were appalled by the injustices they saw committed by the slaveowners against the Indians, and they decided to deny slaveowners the right to confession. Las Casas was himself denied confession for this reason.^[15] In December 1511, a Dominican preacher Father Fray Antonio de Montesinos preached a fiery sermon that implicated the colonists in the genocide of the native peoples. He is said to have preached, "Tell me by what right of justice do you hold these Indians in such a cruel and horrible servitude? On what authority have you waged such detestable wars against these people who dealt quietly and peacefully on their own lands? Wars in which you have destroyed such an infinite number of them by homicides and slaughters never heard of before. Why do you keep them so oppressed and exhausted, without giving them enough to eat or curing them of the sicknesses they incur from the excessive labor you give them, and they die, or rather you kill them, in order to extract and acquire gold every day." ^[16] Las Casas himself argued against the Dominicans in favour of the justice of the encomienda, and the colonists dispatched a complaint against the Dominicans to the King and they were recalled from Hispaniola.^[17]

[edit]Conquest of Cuba and change of heart

Reconstruction of a Taíno village from Las Casas times in contemporary Cuba

In 1513, as a chaplain, Las Casas participated in Diego Velázquez de Cuéllarsand Panfilo de Narvaez' conquest of Cuba. He participated in campaigns in Bayamo andCamagüey and in the massacre ofHatuey.^[18] He witnessed many atrocities committed by Spaniards against the nativeCiboney and Guanahatabey peoples. He later wrote: "I saw here cruelty on a scale no living being has ever seen or expects to see." ^[19] Las Casas and his friend Pablo de la Rentería were awarded a joint encomienda which was rich in gold and slaves, located on the Arimao river close to Cienfuegos. For the next years he divided his time between being a colonist himself, and his duties as an ordained priest.

In 1514 Las Casas was studying a passage in the book of the Roman Catholic bible, Ecclesiasticus (Sirach)^[20] 34:18-22^{[cn 1]} for a Pentecost Sermon and pondering its meaning Las Casas was finally convinced that all the actions of the Spanish in the New World had been illegal and a great injustice. He made up his mind to give up his slaves and encomienda, and started to preach that other colonists should do the same. When his preaching met with resistance he realized that he would have to go to Spain to fight against the enslavement and abuse of the native peoples.^[21] Aided by Pedro de Córdoba and accompanied by Antonio de Montesinos, he left for Spain in September 1515 arriving in Seville in November.^[22][23]

[edit]Las Casas and King Ferdinand

A contemporary painting of King Ferdinand "The Catholic".

Las Casas arrived in Spain with the plan of convincing the king to end the encomienda system. This was easier thought than done, as most of the people who were in positions of power were themselves either encomenderos or otherwise profiting from the influx of wealth from the Indies.^[24] In the winter of 1515 King Ferdinand lay ill inPlasencia, but Las Casas was able to get a letter of introduction to the Majesty from the Archbishop of Seville, Diego de Deza. On Christmas Eve 1515 Las Casas met the Monarch and discussed the situation in the Indies with him, the King agreed to hear him out in more detail at a later date. While waiting Las Casas produced a report that he presented to the Bishop of Burgos Juan Rodríguez de Fonseca and secretary Lope Conchillos, who were functionaries in complete charge of the Royal policies regarding the Indies, they were both Encomenderos. They were not impressed by his account and Las Casas had to find a different avenue of change. He put his faith in his coming audience with the King, but it never came for King Ferdinand died on January 25, 1516.^[25] Regency of the Castile passed on to Ximenez Cisneros and Adrian of Utrecht who were guardians for the underage Prince Charles. Las Casas was resolved to see Prince Charles who resided in Flanders, but on his way there he passed Madrid and delivered to the regents a written account of the situation in the Indies and his proposed remedies. This was his "Memorial de Remedios para Las Indias" of 1516.^[26] In this early work, Las Casas advocated importing Black slaves from Africa to relieve the suffering Indians, a stance he later retracted, becoming also an advocate for the Africans in the colonies.^{[27][28][29] [cn 2]} This shows that Las Casas first concern was not to end slavery necessarily, but to end the physical abuse and suffering of the Indians.^[30] Worried by the visions that Las Casas had drawn up of the situation in the Indies, Cardenal Cisneros decided to send a group ofHieronymite friars to take over the government of the islands.

[edit]Protector of the Indians

Three Hieronymite Friars, Luís de Figueroa, Bernardino de Manzanedo and Alonso de Santo Domingo, were selected to as commissioners to take over the authority of the Indies. Las Casas had a considerable part in selecting them and writing the instructions under which their new government would be instated, largely based on Las Casas' memorial. Las Casas himself was granted the official title of Protector of the Indians, and given a yearly salary of one hundred pesos. In this new office Las Casas was expected to serve as an advisor to the New governors with regards to Indian issues, to speak the case of the Indians in court and send reports back to Spain. Las Casas and the commissioners traveled to Santo Domingo on separate ships, and Las Casas arrived two weeks later than the Hieronimytes. During this time the Hieronimytes had had time to take on a more pragmatic view of the situation than the one advocated by Las Casas, their position was precarious as every encomendero on the Islands were fiercely against any attempts to curtail their use of native labour. Consequently the commissioners were unable to take any radical steps towards improving the situation of the natives. They did revoke some encomiendas from Spaniards, especially those who were living in Spain and not on the Islands themselves, they even repossessed the Encomienda of Fonseca, the Bishop of Burgos. They also performed an inquiry into the Indian question where all the encomenderos asserted that the Indians were quite incapable of living freely without their supervision. Las Casas was disappointed and infuriated and when he accused the Hieronymites of being complicit in kidnapping Indians the relationship between Las Casas and the commissioners broke down. Las Casas had become a hated figure by Spaniards all over the Islands and he had to seek refuge in the Dominican monastery. The Dominicans had been the first to indict the encomenderos and they continued to chastise them and refuse the absolution confession to Slave owners, and even stated that priests who took their confession were committing a mortal sin. In May 1517, Las Casas saw himself forced to travel back to Spain to denounce the failure of the Hieronymite reforms to the regent.^[31] Only after Las Casas had left did the Hieronymites begin to congregate Indians into towns similar to what Las Casas had wanted.^[32]

[edit]Las Casas and King Charles V: The peasant colonization scheme

Contemporary portrait of the young King Charles V.

When he arrived in Spain his former protector, regent and Cardinal Ximenez Cisneros was ill, and had tired of Las Casas tenacity - Las Casas resolved to meet instead with the young King Charles V. Ximenez died on November 8 and the young King arrived in Valladolid on November 25 of 1517. Las Casas managed to secure the support of the King's Flemish courtiers including the powerful Chancellor Jean de la Sauvage. Las Casas influence turned the favor of the court against Secretary Conchillos and Bishop Fonseca, whereas Sauvage spoke highly of Las Casas to the King, who appointed Las Casas and Sauvage to write a new plan for reforming the governmental system of the Indies.^[33]

Las Casas suggested a plan where the encomienda was abolished, Indians were congregated into self-governing townships to become tribute-paying vassals of the King. He still suggested that the loss of Indian labor for the colonists could be replaced by allowing importation of African slaves. Another important part of the plan was to introduce a new kind of sustainable colonisation, and Las Casas advocated supporting the migration of Spanish peasants to the Indies where they would introduce small scale farming and agriculture, a kind of colonisation that didn't rely on resource depletion and Indian labor. Las Casas worked to recruit a large number of peasants who would want to travel to the Islands where they would be given lands to farm and cash advances and the tools and resources they needed to establish themselves there. The recruitment drive was difficult and during it the power relation shifted at court when Chancellor Sauvage unexpectedly died. In the end a much smaller number of peasant families were sent with insufficient provisions and no support secured for their arrival: those who survived the journey were ill received and had to work hard to even survive in the hostile colonies. Las Casas was devastated by the tragic result of his peasant migration scheme, which he felt had been thwarted by his enemies. He decided instead to undertake a personal venture which would not rely on the support of others, and fought instead to win a land grant on the American mainland which was in its earliest stage of colonisation.^[34]

[edit]The Cumaná venture

View over the landscape of Mochima National Park in Venezuela, close to the original location of Las Casas' colony at Cumaná.

The Natives of Cumaná attack the mission after Gonzalez de Ocampo's slaving raid. Colored copperplate by Theodor de Bry, published in the "Relación brevissima"

Following a suggestion by his friend and mentor Pedro de Córdoba, Las Casas petitioned a land grant to be allowed to establish a settlement in northern Venezuelaat Cumaná. Founded in 1515 there were already a small Franciscan monastery in Cumaná and a Dominican one at Chiribichi, but the monks there were being harassed by Spaniards operating slave raids from the nearby Island of Cubagua. In order to make the proposal palatable to the King Las Casas had to incorporate the prospect of profits for the royal treasury.^[35] He suggested fortifying the northern coast of Venezuela, establishing ten royal forts to protect the Indians and start up a system of trade in gold and pearls. All the Indian slaves of the Indies should be brought to live in these towns and become tributa paying subjects to the King. In order to secure the grant Las Casas had to go through a long fight in court against Bishop Fonseca and his supports Gonzalo de Oviedo, and Bishop Quevedo of Tiera Firme, Las Casas' supports were Diego Columbusand the new chancellor Gattinara. Las Casas enemies slandered him to the King, accusing him of planning to escape with the money toGenoa or Rome. In 1520 Las Casas' concession was finally granted, but it was a much smaller grant than he had initially proposed, he was also denied the possibilities of extracting gold and pearls, which made it difficult for him to find investors for the venture. Las Casas committed himself to produce 15,000 ducats of annual revenue, increasing to 60,000 after ten years, and to erect three Christian towns of at least 40 settlers.Some privileges were also granted to the initial 50 shareholders in Las Casas scheme, and the King also promised not to give any encomienda grants in Las Casas' area. Finding fifty men willing to invest 200 ducats each and three years of unpaid work proved impossible for Las Casas. And in the end he ended up leaving in November 1520 with just a small group of peasants, paying for the venture with money borrowed from his brother in-law.^[36]

Arriving in Puerto Rico in January 1521 he received the terrible news that the Dominican convent at Chiribichi had been sacked by Indians and the Spaniards of the Islands had launched a punitive expedition, led by Gonzalo de Ocampo, into the very heart of the territory that Las Casas wanted to peacefully colonize. The Indians had been provoked to attack the monks by repeated slave raids by Spaniards operating from Cubagua. As Ocampo's ships began returning with slaves from the land Las Casas had been granted, he went to Hispaniola to complain to the Audiencia. After several months of negotiations Las Casas set sail alone, the peasants he had brought had deserted and arrived in his colony already ravaged by Spaniards.^[37]

Las Casas worked there in adverse conditions for the following months, being constantly harassed by the Spanish pearl fishers of Cubagua who traded slaves for alcohol with the natives. Early in 1522 Las Casas left the settlement to complain to the authorities. While he was gone the native Caribs attacked the settlement of Cumaná, burned it to the ground and killed four of Las Casas' men.^[38] He returned to Hispaniola on January 1522, and heard the news of the massacre, the rumours even included him among the dead.^[39] To make matters worse, his detractors used this as an example of the need to pacify the Indians using military means. This tragic outcome of Las Casas great mainland adventure made Las Casas turn life in a new direction.

[edit]A Dominican friar

The Church of the town of Rabinal, built in 1572, on the site of Las Casas' earlier settlement.

Devastated, Las Casas reacted by entering the Dominican monastery of Santa Cruz inSanto Domingo as a novice in 1522 and finally taking holy vows as a Dominican friarin 1523.^[40] There he continued his theological studies, being particularly attracted to Thomist philosophy, and there is little information about his activities in the following ten years. He oversaw the construction of a monastery in Puerto Plataon the north coast of Hispaniola, subsequently serving as prior of the convent. In 1527 he began working on his History of the Indies in order to report many of the first hand experiences that he had witnessed in the conquest and colonization of New Spain. In 1531 he wrote a letter to Garcia Manrique, Count of Osorno, protesting again the mistreatment of the Indians and advocating a return to his original reform plan of 1516. In 1531 a complaint was sent by the encomendero's of Hispaniola that Las Casas was again accusing them of mortal sins from the pulpit. In 1533 he contributed to the making of a peace treaty between the Spanish and the rebel Taíno band of chief Enriquillo.^[41] In 1534 Las Casas made an attempt to travel to Peru to observe the first stages of conquest of that regionby Francisco Pizarro, his party made it as far as Panama, but had to turn back to Nicaraguadue to adverse weather circumstances. Lingering for awhile in the Dominican convent ofGranada and got into conflict with Rodrigo de Contreras, Governor of Nicaragua when Las Casas vehemently opposed slaving expeditions by the Governor.^[42] In 1536 Las Casas followed a number of friars to Guatemala, where they began to prepare to undertake a mission among the Maya Indians. They stayed in the convent founded some years earlier by fray Domingo de Betanzos and studied K'iche' language with Bishop Francisco Marroquín, before traveling into the interior in 1537.^[43]

Toribio de Benavente "Motolinia", Las Casas' Franciscan adversary.

Las Casas wanted to employ a new method of conversion based on two principles: To preach the gospel to all men and treat them as equals, 2. that conversion must be voluntary and based on knowledge and understanding of the faith. It was important for Las Casas that this method be tested without meddling from secular colonists so he chose a territory in the heart of Guatemala where there were no previous colonies and where the natives were consider fierce and war-like. Because of the fact that the land had not been possible to conquer by military means the governor of Guatemala Alonso de Maldonadoagreed to sign a contract promising that if the venture was successful, he would not establish any new encomiendas in the area. Las Casas' group of friars established a Dominican presence in Rabinal,Sacapulas and in Cobán. By teaching Christian songs to merchant Indian Christians who then ventured into the area, he was successful in converting several native chiefs, among them those of Atitlán, Chichicastenango, and building several churches in the territory named Alta Verapaz. And they congregated a group of Christian Indian's in the location of what is now the town of Rabinal.^[44] In 1538 Las Casas was recalled from his mission by Bishop Marroquín who wanted him to go to Mexico and then on to Spain in order to seek more Dominican's to assist in the mission.^[45]

While in México Las Casas participated in a series of discussions and debates among the friars of the Dominican and Franciscan orders, the two orders had very different approaches to the conversion of the Indians. The Franciscans used a method of mass conversion, sometimes baptising many thousand Indians in a day. This method was championed by prominent Franciscans such as Toribio de Benavente known as "Motolinia", and Las Casas made many enemies among the Franciscans for arguing that conversions made without adequate understanding were invalid. Las Casas' wrote a treatise called "De unico vocationis modo" (On the Only Way of Conversion) based on the missionary principles used in Guatemala. Motolinia would later be a fierce critic of Las Casas, accusing him of being all talk and no action when it came to converting the Indians.^[46] As a direct result of the debates between the Dominicans and Franciscan's and spurred on by Las Casas' treatise,Pope Paul III promulgated the Bull "Sublimus Dei", which stated that the Indians were rational beings and should be brought peacefully to the faith as such.^[47] Having stayed in Mexico for more than a year Las Casas set out for Spain in 1540.

[edit]The New Laws

Cover of the New Laws of 1542.

In Spain, Las Casas started securing official support for the Guatemalan mission, and he managed to get a royal decree forbidding secular intrusion into the Verapaces for the following five years. He also informed theTheologians of Salamanca, led by Francisco de Vitoria of the mass baptism practiced by the Franciscans, resulting in a dictumcondemning the practice as sacrilegious.^[48]

But apart from the clerical business, Las Casas had also traveled to Spain for his own purpose: to continue the struggle against the colonists' mistreatment of the Indians.^[49]The Encomienda had, in fact, been abolished in 1523, but they had also been reinstituted in 1526 and in 1530 a general ordinance against slavery was reversed by the Crown. For this reason it was a pressing matter for Bartolomé de las Casas to pleade once again for the Indians with Charles V who was now Holy Roman Emperor. He wrote a letter asking for permission to stay in Spain a little longer in order to argue for the Emperor that conversion and colonization was best achieved by peaceful means.^[50]

When the hearings started in 1542 Las Casas presented a narrative of atrocities against the natives of the Indies that would later be published in 1552 as "Brevissima relación de la destruición de las Indias". Before a council consisting of Cardinal Garcia de Loaysa, theCount of Osorno, Bishop Fuenleal and several members of the Council of the Indies, Las Casas argued that the only solution to the problem were to remove all Indians from the care of secular Spaniards by abolishing the encomienda system and putting instead them directly under the Crown as royal tribute paying subjects.^[51] On November 20, 1542 the Emperor signed the New Laws abolishing the encomiendas and removing certain officials from the Council of the Indies.^[52] The New Laws made it illegal to use Indians as carriers, except where no other transport was available, it prohibited all taking of Indians as slaves, and it instated a gradual abolition of the encomienda system, with each encomienda revertin to the Crown at the death of its holders. It also exempted the few surviving Indians of Hispaniola,Cuba, Puerto Rico and Jamaica from tribute and all requirements of personal service. However, the reforms were so unpopular back in the New World that riots broke out and threats were made against Las Casas' life. The Viceroy of New Spain decided not to implement the laws in his domain and instead send a party to Spain to argue against the laws on behalf of the encomenderos.^[53] Las Casas himself was also not satisfied with the laws as they were not drastic enough and the encomienda system was going to function for many years stil under the gradual abolition plan. He drafted a suggestion for an amendment arguing that the laws against slavery were formulated in such a way that it presupposed that violent conquest would still be carried out, and he encouraged once again beginning a phase of peaceful colonisation by peasants instead of soldiers.^[54]

[edit]Bishop of Chiapas

The Church of the Dominican Convent of San Pablo in Valladolid where Bartolomé de Las Casas was consecrated as Bishop on March 30th 1544.

Before Las Casas returned to Spain he was also appointed as Bishop of Chiapas, a newly established diocese of which he took possession in 1545 upon his return to the New World. He was consecrated in the Dominican Church of San Pablo on march 30th 1544, the ceremonied being officiated by two Bishops instead of by archbishopLoaysa who strongly disliked Las Casas.^[55]As a Bishop Las Casas was involved in frequent conflicts with the encomenderos and secular of his diocese, among them the conquistador Bernal Díaz del Castillo. In aPastoral letter issued on march 20th 1545 he refused absolution to slave owners and encomenderos even on their death bed, unless all their slaves had been set free and their property restituted to them.^[56] Las Casas furthermore threatened that anyone who mistreated Indians within his jurisdiction would be ex-communicated. He also came into conflict with the Bishop of Guatemala Francisco Marroquín, to whose jurisdiction the diocese had previously belonged. Bishop Marroquín openly defied the New Laws to Las Casas' dismay. The New Laws were repealed on October 20, 1545, and riots broke out against Las Casas.^[57] After a year he had made himself so unpopular among the Spaniards of the area that he had to leave. Having been summoned to a meeting among the Bishops of New Spain to be held in Mexico City on January 12, 1546, he left his diocese never to return.^[58][59] At the meeting, probably after lengthy reflection, and realizing that the New Laws were lost in Mexico, Las Casas presented a moderated view on the problems of confession and restitution of property, Archbishop Zumarraga and Bishop Garces of Puebla agreed completely with his new moderate stance, Bishop of Michoacán Vasco de Quirogahad minor reservations, and Bishops Marroquin of Guatemala and Zarate of Oaxaca did not object. This resulted in a new resolution to be presented to viceroy Mendoza.^[60] His last act as Bishop of Chiapas was writing a confesionario, a manual for the administration of the Sacrament of Confession in his diocese, still refusing absolution to unrepentant encomenderos. Las Casas appointed a vicar for his diocese and set out for Europe in December 1546, arriving in Lisbon in April 1547 and in Spain on November 1547.^[61]

[edit]The Valladolid Debates

Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda, Las Casas opponent in the Valladolid debate.

Las Casas returned to Spain, leaving behind many conflicts and unresolved issues. Arriving in Spain he was received by a barrage of accusations, many of them based on his Confesionario and its 12 rules, which many of his opponents found to be in essence a denial of the legitimacy of Spanish rule of its colonies, and hence a form of treason. The Crown had for example received a fifth of the large number of slaves taken in the recent Mixtón War, and so could not be held clean of guilt under Las Casas' strict rules. In 1548 the Crown decreed that all copies of Las Casas' confesionario be burnt, and his Franciscan adversary Motolinia, happily obliged, sending back a report to Spain. Las Casas defended himself by writing two treatises on the "Just Title" - arguing that the only legality with which the Spaniards could claim Titles over realms in the New World was through peaceful proselytizing, all warfare was illegal and unjust and only through the papal mandate of peacefully bringing Christianity to heathen peoples could "Just Titles" be acquired.^[62]

As a part of Las Casas' defense by offense he had to argue against Juan Gines de Sepulvedaa doctor of theology and law, who in his book Democrates Alter, sive de justis causis apud Indios (Democrates Alter, or on the just causes of War against the Indians) had argued that the native people were naturally inferior and should be pacified forcefully, and were destined to perpetual servitude to Christian Europeans. The book was deemed unsound for publication by the Theologians of Salamanca and Alcalá for containing unsound doctrine, but the pro-encomendero faction seized on Sepúlveda as their intellectual champion.^[63]

In order to settle the issues a formal debate was organized, the famous Valladolid debate, which took place in 1550-51 with Sepúlveda and Las Casas each presenting their arguments in front of a council of jurists and theologians. First Sepúlveda read the conclusions of hisDemocrates Alter, and then the council listened to Las Casas reading his counterarguments in the form of an "Apología". Sepúlveda argued that the subjugation of the Indians was warranted because of their sins as pagans; that their low level of civilization requiring Civilized masters to maintain social order; that the fact that they required Christianity and that this in turn required them to be pacified; and the fact that only the Spanish could defend the weak Indians against the abuses of the stronger ones.^[64] Las Casas countered that the scriptures did not in fact support war against all heathens, only against certain canaaanite tribes; that the Indians were not at all uncivilized nor lacked social order; that peaceful mission was the only true way of converting the natives; and finally that some weak Indians suffering at the hands of stronger ones was preferable to all Indians suffering at the hands of Spaniards.^[65]

Then the judge, Fray Domingo de Soto, summarised the arguments. Sepúlveda addressed Las Casas' arguments with twelve refutations, which were again countered by Las Casas. The Judges then deliberated on the arguments presented for several months before coming to a verdict.^[66] The verdict was inconclusive and both debaters claimed that they had won the debate.^[67]

In 1552, Las Casas published A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies. This book, written a decade earlier and sent to the attention to then-prince Philip II of Spain, contained accounts of the abuses committed by some Spaniards against Native Americans during the early stages of colonization. In 1555 the his old Franciscan adversary Toribio de Benavente "Motolinia" wrote a letter in which he described Las Casas as an ignorant, arrogant troublemaker, describing how once las Casas denied Baptism to an aging Indian who had walked many leagues to receive baptism from the Bishop, only on the grounds that he did not believe that the man had received sufficient instruction in the doctrine. This letter which reinvoked the old conflict over the requirements for the sacrament of baptism between the two orders, was intended to bring las Casas in disfavour. It did however, not succeed.^[68]

[edit]Later years and death

The Façade of the Colegio de San Gregorio in Valladolid, where Las Casas spent his final decades.

Having resigned the Bishopric of Chiapas, Las Casas spent the rest of his life working closely with the imperial court in matters relating to the Indies. In 1551 he rented a cell at the College of San Gregorio where he lived with his assistant and friend Fray Rodrigo de Ladrada.^[69] He continued working as a kind of procurator for the natives of the indies, many of whom directed petitions to him, to speak to the Emperor on their behalf. Sometimes Indigenous nobility even visited Spain to relate their cases to him, as did, for example, the Nahua noble Francisco Tenamaztle from Nochistlán. His influence at court was so great that some even considered that he had the final word in choosing the members of the Council of the Indies.^[70]

One matter in which he invested many efforts was the political situation of the Viceroyalty of Peru. In Peru power struggles between Conquistadors and the viceroy became an open civil war in which the conquistadors led by Gonzalo Pizarro rebelled against the New Laws and defeated and executed the viceroy Blasco Núñez Vela in 1546. The Emperor sentPedro de la Gasca a friend of Las Casas to reinstate a legal rule, and he in turn defeated Pizarro. In order to restabilize the political situation the encomenderos started pushing not only for the repeal of the New Laws, but for making turning the encomiendas into perpetual patrimony of the encomenderos - the worst possible out come from Las Casas' point of view. The encomenderos offered to buy the rights to the encomiendas from the Crown, and Charles V was inclined to accept since his wars had left him in deep economic troubles. Las Casas worked hard to convince the king that it would be a bad economic decision and that it would return the Viceroyalty to the brink of open rebellion, and could result in the Crown losing the colony entirely. The Emperor, probably because of the doubts caused by Las Casas' arguments, never took a final decision on the issue of the encomiendas.^[71]

In 1561 he finished his Historia General de las Indias and signed it over to the College of San Gregorio, stipulating that it could not be published until after forty years. It was in fact not published until 1875. He also had to keep defending himself against accusations of treason: Someone, possibly Sepúlveda, accused him to the Spanish Inquisition, but nothing came from that case.^[72] Las Casas' also appeared as a witness in the case of the Inquisition against his friend Archbishop Bartolomé Carranza de Miranda, falsely accused of heresy.^[73][74] In 1565 he wrote his last will signing over his immense library to the college. Bartolome de Las Casas died on July 18, 1566 in Madrid.

[edit]Works

[edit]Memorial de Remedios para las Indias

The text starts by describing its purpose: to present “The remedies that seem necessary in order that the evil and harm that exists in the Indies cease, and that God and our Lord the Prince may draw greater benefits than hitherto, and that the republic may be better preserved and consoled”^[75]

Las Casas's first proposed remedy is the complete moratorium on the use of Indian labor in the indies until such a time that better regulations of it have been set in place. This should serve simply to halt the decimation of the Indian population and give the surviving Indians time to reconstitute themselves. Las Casas feared that at the rate the exploitation is going it will be too late to hinder their annihilation unless action is taken rapidly. The second is a change of the labor policy so that instead of a colonist owning the labor of specific Indians, he should have right to man hours, to be carried out by no specific persons. This requires the establishment of self governing Indian communities on the land of colonists - who will themselves organize to provide the labor for their patron. The colonist would only have rights to a certain portion of the total labor, so that a part of the Indians are always resting and taking care of the sick. He proposes 12 other remedies all having the specific aim of improving the situation for the Indians and limiting the powers that colonists are able to exercise over them.

The second part of the memorial describes suggestions for the social and political organization of Indian communities relative to colonial ones. Las Casas advocates the dismantlement of the city of Asunción and the subsequent gathering of Indians into communities of ca. 1000 Indians to be situated as satellites of Spanish towns or mining areas. Here, Las Casas argues, the Indians can be better governed, better taught and indoctrinated into the Christian faith, and they will be easier to protect form abuse than in scattered settlements. Each town should have a royal Hospital built with four wings in the shape of a cross, where up to 200 sick Indians could be cared for at a time. He describes in detail the social arrangements, distribution of work, how provisions should be divided and how even table manners should be introduced. For all of the expenses he argues that “this should not seem expensive or difficult, because after all, everything comes form them [the indians] and they work for it and it is theirs”^[76] He even draws up a budget of each pueblo's expenses to cover wages for administrators, clerics, Bachelors of Latin, doctors, surgeons, pharmacists, advocates, ranchers, miners, muleteers, hospitalers, pigherders, fishermen etc. He shows that this arrangement can easily be kept and a profit still extracted by the continued extraction of gold.

[edit]A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies

Main article: A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies

Cover of the Brevísima relación de la destrucción de las Indias (1552), Bartolomé de las Casas.

A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies^{[cn 3]} (Spanish: Brevísima relación de la destrucción de las Indias) is an account written in 1542 (published in 1552) about the mistreatment of the Indigenous Peoples of the Americas in colonial times and sent to then Prince Philip II of Spain.

One of the stated purposes for writing the account is his fear of Spain coming under divine punishment and his concern for the souls of the Native Peoples. The account is one of the first attempts by a Spanish writer of the colonial era to depict the unfair treatment that the indigenous people endured during the early stages of the Spanish conquest of the Greater Antilles, particularly the island of La Hispaniola. Las Casas's point of view can be described as being heavily against some of the Spanish methods of colonization, which, as he describes, have inflicted a great loss on the indigenous occupants of the islands. His account is largely responsible for the passage of the new Spanish colonial laws known as the New Laws of 1542, which abolished native slavery for the first time in European colonial history and led to the Valladolid debate.

The book became an important piece in the creation and propagation of the so-called Black Legend - the tradition of describing the Spanish empire as exceptionally morally corrupt and violent. The book was published several times by groups that were critical of the Spanish realm for political or religious reasons. The first edition in translation was published in Dutch in 1578, during the religious persecution of Dutch Protestants by the Soanish crown, it was followed by editions in French (1578), English (1583) and German (1599) - all countries where Religious wars were raging. The first edition published in Spain after Las Casas death appeared in Barcelona during the Catalan revolt of 1646 the book was banned by theAragonese inquisition in 1659.^[77]

The images described by Las Casas were later depicted by Theodore de Bry in copper plate engravings that helped expand the Black Legend against Spain.

• Las Casas, Bartolomé de (1999). Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies. London: Penguin. ISBN 978-0140445626.

[edit]Apologetic History of the Indies

The "Apologetic summary History of the People of these Indies" (Spanish Apologética historia summaria de las gentes destas Indias) was first written as the sixty-eighth chapter of the General History of the Indies, but Las Casas changed it into a volume of its own, recognizing that the material was not historical. The material contained in the Apologetic history is primarily ethnographic accounts of the indigenous cultures of the indies - the Taíno, the Ciboney and the Guanahatabey, but it also contains descriptions of many of the other indigenous cultures that Las Casas learned about through his travels and readings. The history is apologetic because it is written as a defense of the cultural level of the Indians, arguing throughout that indigenous peoples of the Americas were just as civilized as the Roman, Greek and Egyptian civilization - and more civilized than some other European high civilizations. It is in essence a comparative ethnography comparing practices and customs of European and American cultures and evaluating them according to whether they are good or bad, seen from a Christian viewpoint. He writes: "I have declared and demonstrated openly and concluded, from chapter 22 to the end of this whole book, that all people of these our Indies are human, so far as is possible by the natural and human way and without the light of faith - had their republics, places, towns, and cities most abundant and well provided for, and di not lack anything to live poitically and socially, and attain and enjoy civil happiness...And they equalled many nations of this world that are renowned and considered civilized, and they surpassed many others, and to none were they inferior. Among those they equalled were the Greeks and the Romans, and they surpassed them by many good and better customs. They surpassed also the English and the French and some of the people of our own Spain; and they were incomparably superior to countless others, in having good customs and lacking many evil ones."^[78] This work in which Las Casas combines his own ethnographic observations with those of other writers, and compares customs and cultures between different peoples has been characterized as an early beginning of the discipline ofAnthropology.^[79]

[edit]History of the Indies

The History of the Indies is a three volume work begun in 1527 while Las Casas was in the Convent of Puerto de Plata. It found its final form in 1561 when he was working in the Colegio de San Gregorio. Originally planned as a six volume work each volume describes a decade of the history of the Indies from the arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492 to 1520, and most of it is an eye-witness account.^[80] It was also in the History of the Indies that Bartolomé de Las Casas finally regretted his advocacy for African slavery, he included a sincere apology writing: "I soon repented and judged myself guilty of ignorance. I came to realize that black slavery was as unjust as Indian slavery . . . and I was not sure that my ignorance and good faith would secure me in the eyes of God. (Vol II, p. 257)" ^[81]

[edit]Las Casas in Posteriority

Fray Bartolomé de las Casas depicted as Savior of the Indians in a later painting by Felix Parra

"Fray Bartolomé de las Casas, convertiendo a una familia azteca" by Miguel Noreña

Las Casas' legacy has been highly controversial. In the years following his death his ideas became a taboo in the Spanish realm, and he was seen as an extremist almost heretic, the accounts written by his enemies Lopez de Gómara, and Oviedo were widely read and published. As the British empire rose to power and hostilities between the British and Spanish began, the British used Las Casas' accounts of Spanish cruelty as a political tool making it part of the foundation of what Spanish nationalists have called the Black Legend, the tendency of Historians to slander Spain for its imperial past, while looking mildly at the same undertakings by e.g. the British.^[82]

Anti-Lascasian history writing had its climax in the history writing of Spanish right-wing, nationalist historians in the late 19th and early 20th century constructing a pro-Spanish White Legend, arguing that the Spanish empire was benevolent and just, and denying any adverse consequences of Spanish colonialism.^[83][84] Spanish pro-imperial historians such as Menéndez y Pelayo Menéndez Pidal and J. Pérez de Barrada have painted a picture of Las Casas as a madman, describing him as a "paranoic" and a monomaniac given to exaggeration and .^[85] and as a traitor towards his own nation.^[86] Menéndez-Pelayo also accused las Casas of having been instrumental in suppressing the publication of Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda's "Democrates Alter" out of spite, but other historians find this unlikely since it was rejected by both the Theologians of Alcalá and Salamanca who were unlikely to be influenced by las Casas.^[87]

[edit]Critiques

Las Casas has also often been accused of exaggerating the atrocities he described in the Indies, some scholars holding that the initial population figures given by Las Casas were too high making the population decline look worse than it actually was, and that epidemics of European disease were the prime cause of the population decline, not violence and exploitation. Demographic studies such as those of Colonial Mexico by Cook in the mid 20th century suggested that the decline in the first years of the conquest was indeed drastic - ranging between 80 and 90%, due of course to many different causes, but all ultimately traceable to European arrival.^[88] It has also been noted that exaggeration of numbers was the norm in writing in 16th century accounts, and both contemporary detractors and supporters of Las Casas were guilty of similar exaggerations of numbers.^[89][90]

It has also been suggested that the atrocities that las Casas describes were exaggerated or even invented, but this is not generally considered likely as Las Casas was far from the only person who was intensely worried about abuse and mistreatment of the Indians - the Dominican Friars Antonio de Montesinos and Pedro de Córdoba had reported extensive violence already in the first decade of the Conquest of the Indies, and throughout the conquest of the Americas there were reports of abuse of the natives by Friars and priests and ordinary citizens, and many massacres of indigenous are were reported in full by those who perpetrated them. Even some of Las Casas enemies, such as Toribio de Benavente "Motolinia" reported many gruesome atrocities committed against the Indians by the colonizers. All in all modern historians tend to disregard the precise figures given by Las Casas, but maintain that the general picture he presents of an intensely violent and abusive conquest was not unrealistic.^[91]

One persistent point of criticism has been Las Casas' repeated suggestions of replacing Indian with African slave labor. Even though he regretted this position towards the end of his life and included an apology in his History of the Indies,^[92] some later criticism has even held him responsible for the institution of the Atlantic slave trade. For example the abolitionistDavid Walker was fiercely critical of Las Casas, calling him a "wretch...stimulated by sordid avarice only" holding him responsible for the enslavement of thousands of Africans.^[93] Other historians,such as John Fiske writing in 1900, have denied that Las Casas' suggestions had any actual effect on the development of the slave trade. Modern historians generally do not consider Las Casas to have had any effect on the Slave trade which was already well in place before he began writing.^[94]

Revisionist histories of the late 20th century have argued in favor of a more nuanced image of Las Casas, suggesting that he was neither a saint or a fanatic, but a person with a spectacular willpower and sense of justice, which sometimes led him into the sins of arrogance, stubbornness and hypocrisy. Some historians such as Castro (2007), argue that he was more of a politician than a humanitarian, and that his liberation policies were always combined with schemes to make colonial extraction of resources from the natives more efficient. He also argues that Las Casas failed to realize that by seeking to replace indigenous spiritualities with Christianity, he was in effect undertaking a spiritual colonialism that was in a way more intrusive than the physical one.^[95] This critique has been rejected by other historians as facile and anachronistic.^[96][97]

[edit]Cultural legacy

Saints portal

In 1848 the capital of the Mexican state of Chiapas, Ciudad de San Cristobal was renamed San Cristóbal de Las Casas, in honor of its first bishop. In 2000, the Roman Catholic Church began the process for hisbeatification. His work is a particular inspiration behind the work of the Las Casas Institute atBlackfriars Hall, Oxford.^[98] He is also often referenced as a predecessor of the Liberation Theology. He is commemorated by the Church of England in the Calendar of Saints on July 20.

Bartolomé de Las Casas has also come to be seen as an early advocate for a concept of Universal Human Rights.^{[cn 4][99]} He was among the first to develop a view of unity among human kind stating that "All people of the world are humans", and that they had a natural right to liberty - a combination of Thomist rights philosophy with Augustinian political theology.^[100] In this capacity a Ecumenical Human Rights institute located in San Cristobal de las Casas, the Centro Fray Bartolomé de las Casas de Derechos Humanos, has been named after him.^[101]

[edit]Notes

Content notes

1. ^ "If one sacrifices from what has been wrongfully obtained, the offering is blemished; the gifts of the lawless are not acceptable....Like one who kills a son before his father's eyes is the man who offers sacrifice from the property of the poor. The bread of the needy is the life of the poor; whoever deprives them of it is a man of blood." quoted from Brading 1997:119-20
2. ^ Las Casas' retraction of his views on African slavery is expressed particularly in chapters 102 and 129, Book III of his Historia.
3. ^ Also translated and published in English as A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies, among several other variants.
4. ^ Glendon 2003 writes: "When Latin American nations gained independence in the nineteenth century, those two strains converged, and merged with an older, more universalist, natural law tradition. The result was a distinctively Latin American form of rights discourse. Paolo Carozza traces the roots of that discourse to a distinctive application, and extension, of Thomistic moral philosophy to the injustices of Spanish conquests in the New World. The key figure in that development seems to have been Bartolomé de Las Casas, a sixteenth-century Spanish bishop who condemned slavery and championed the cause of Indians on the basis of a natural right to liberty grounded in their membership in a single common humanity. “All the peoples of the world are humans,” Las Casas wrote, and “all the races of humankind are one.” According to Brian Tierney, Las Casas and other Spanish Dominican philosophers laid the groundwork for a doctrine of natural rights that was independent of religious revelation “by drawing on a juridical tradition that derived natural rights and natural law from human rationality and free will, and by appealing to Aristotelian philosophy.”"

Citations

1. ^ Parish & Weidman 1976
2. ^ See for example in Beuchot (1994)
3. ^ Parish & Weidman 1976: 385
4. ^ Parish & Weidman 1976: passim.
5. ^ eg. Saunders 2007: 162
6. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:1-3
7. ^ Giménez Fernandez 1971:67
8. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:1-3
9. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:4
10. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:71-72
11. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:72
12. ^ Wagner & Parish1967:5
13. ^ Wagner & Parish1967:6
14. ^ Baptiste 1990:7
15. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:11
16. ^ Bartolome de Las Casas: Witness: Writing of Bartolome de Las casas. ed and trans by George Sanderlin (Maryknoll: Orbis books, 1993) 66-67.
17. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:8-9
18. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:73
19. ^ Bartolome de Las Casas: Indian Freedom, the cause of Bartolome de las Casas. Translated and edited by Francis Patrick Sullivan (Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, 1995), p. 146.
20. ^ Ecclesiasticus,Encyclopædia Britannica' ' online
21. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:11-13
22. ^ Baptiste 1990:69
23. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:13-15
24. ^ Wagner and Parish 1967:15
25. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:15-17
26. ^ Baptiste 1990:7-10
27. ^ "Columbus 'sparked a genocide'". BBC News. October 12, 2003. Retrieved 2006-10-21.
28. ^ Blackburn 1997:136
29. ^ Friede 1971:165–166.
30. ^ Wagner 1967:23
31. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:25-30
32. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:33
33. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:35-38
34. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:38-45
35. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:46-49
36. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:60-62
37. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:63-66
38. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:69
39. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:82
40. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:70-72
41. ^ Parish & Wagner 1967:74-78
42. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:79-84
43. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:85
44. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:86-93
45. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967.94-95
46. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:98-100
47. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:89
48. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:103
49. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:105-6
50. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:106-7
51. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:109-13
52. ^ Giménez Fernández 1971:96
53. ^ Giménez Fernández 1971:101
54. ^ Wagner & Parish 1967:16-17
55. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:99
56. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:103
57. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:103
58. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:103
59. ^ Brading 1997:133
60. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:104-5
61. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:106
62. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:170-74
63. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:174-76
64. ^ Losada 1971:285-300
65. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:178-9
66. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:1977
67. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:181-2
68. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:98-100, 243-244
69. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:183-4
70. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:191-2
71. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971: ch. XVII
72. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:186-88
73. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:222-4
74. ^ Gimenez Fernandez 1971:113
75. ^ Las Casas in Baptiste 1990:14
76. ^ Baptiste 1990:45
77. ^ Keen 1969:712
78. ^ Las Casas, Historia Apologetica, cited in Wagner & Parish 1971_203-4
79. ^ Hanke 1951:88-89
80. ^ Las Casas, Bartolomé(1875). Fuensanta del Valle, Feliciano Ramírez de Arellano, marqués de la, 1826-1896; Sancho Rayón, José León, 1830-1900. ed. Historia de Las Indias vol. 1. Madrid, Impr. de M. Ginesta.
81. ^ Bartolomé de las Casas and Truth: Toward a Spirituality of Solidarity, by Brian Pierce "Spirituality Today" Spring 1992, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 4-19 "
82. ^ Keen 1971:46-48
83. ^ Keen 1971:50-52.
84. ^ Comas 1971 passim
85. ^ Comas 1971:520-1
86. ^ Comas 1971:524-5
87. ^ Comas 1971:515
88. ^ Keen 1971:44-47
89. ^ Comas 1971:502-4
90. ^ Wagner & Parish 1971:245
91. ^ Comas 1971 passim
92. ^ Comas 1971
93. ^ Walker's Appeal p. 40
94. ^ Keen 1971:39
95. ^ Castro 2007
96. ^ Boruchoff 2008
97. ^ Rubies 2007
98. ^ Las Casas Instituteat Blackfriars Hall website
99. ^ Carozza 2003
100. ^ Tierney 1997:272-274
101. ^ Frayba.org.mx - Fray Bartolome de las Casas Centro de Derechos Humanos

[edit]References

Alcedo, Antonio de (1786). Diccionario geográfico-histórico de las Indias Occidentales ó América: es á saber: de los reynos del Perú, Nueva España, Tierra Firme, Chile, y Nuevo reyno de Granada. vol. 1. Madrid: Benito Cano. OCLC 2414115. (Spanish)

Baptiste, Victor N. (1990). Bartolomé de las Casas and Thomas More's Utopia:Connections and similarities.. Labyrinthos. ISBN o-911437-43-6.

Beuchot, Mauricio (1994). Los fundamentos de los derechos humanos en Bartolomé de las Casas. Anthropos Editorial.(Spanish)

Blackburn, Robin (1997). The Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern, 1492-1800 (1st Verso pbk [1998 printing] ed.). London: Verso Books. ISBN 1-85984-195-3. OCLC 40130171.

Brading, David (1997). "Prophet and apostle: Bartolomé de las Casas and the spiritual conquest of America". In J.S. Cummins (ed.). Christianity and Missions, 1450-1800. An Expanding World: The European Impact on World History, 1450-1800 [Ashgate Variorum series].vol. 28. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing. pp. 117–138. ISBN 978-0-86078-519-4.OCLC 36130668.

Boruchoff, David A. (2008). "Another Face of Empire: Bartolomé de las Casas, Indigenous Rights, and Ecclesiastical Imperialism (review)". Early American Literature 43 (2): 497–504.

Carozza, Paolo G. (2003). "From Conquest to Constitutions: Retrieving a Latin American Tradition of the Idea of Human Rights". Human Rights Quarterly (The Johns Hopkins University Press) 25: 281–313.

Castro, Daniel (2007). Another Face of Empire. Duke University Press.

Comas, Juan (1971). Juan Friede and Benjamin Keen (eds.). ed. Bartolomé de las Casas in History: Toward an Understanding of the Man and his Work. Collection spéciale: CER. DeKalb:Northern Illinois University Press. pp. 127–234. ISBN 0-87580-025-4.OCLC 421424974.

Friede, Juan (1971). "Las Casas and Indigenism in the Sixteenth Century". In Juan Friede and Benjamin Keen (eds.). Bartolomé de las Casas in History: Toward an Understanding of the Man and his Work. Collection spéciale: CER. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press. pp. 127–234. ISBN 0-87580-025-4. OCLC 421424974.

Giménez Fernández, Manuel (1971). "Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas: A Biographical Sketch". In Juan Friede and Benjamin Keen (eds.). Bartolomé de las Casas in History: Toward an Understanding of the Man and his Work. Collection spéciale: CER. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press. pp. 67–126. ISBN 0-87580-025-4. OCLC 421424974.

Glendon, Mary Ann (2003). "The Forgotten Crucible: The Latin American Influence on the Universal Human Rights Idea". Harvard Human Rights Journal 16.

Guitar, Lynne (1997). "Encomienda System". In Junius P. Rodriguez (ed.). The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery. vol. 1, A-K. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. pp. 250–251. ISBN 0-87436-885-5. OCLC 37884790.

Hanke. Lewis (1951). Bartolomé de Las Casas: An interpretation of his life and writings. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Hanke, Lewis (1952). Bartolomé de Las Casas: Bookman, Scholar & Propagandist. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Jay, Felix (2002). Bartolomé de Las Casas (1474-1566) in the pages of Father Antonio de Remesal. Edwin Mellen Press. ISBN 0-77347131-6.

Keen, Benjamin (1971). "Introduction: Approaches to Las Casas, 1535 - 1970". In Juan Friede and Benjamin Keen (eds.). Bartolomé de las Casas in History: Toward an Understanding of the Man and his Work. Collection spéciale: CER. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press. pp. 67–126. ISBN 0-87580-025-4. OCLC 421424974.

Las Casas, Bartolomé de (1997). Apologetic History of the Indies. Columbia University Sources of Medieval History. Extracts.

Losada, Ángel (1971). "Controversy between Sepúlveda and Las Casas". In Juan Friede andBenjamin Keen (eds.). Bartolomé de las Casas in History: Toward an Understanding of the Man and his Work. Collection spéciale: CER. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press. pp. 279–309. ISBN 0-87580-025-4. OCLC 421424974.

MacNutt, Francis Augustus (1909) (PDF online reproduction). Bartholomew de Las Casas: His Life, Apostolate, and Writings (Project Gutenberg EBook no. 23466, reproduction ed.). Cleveland, Ohio: Arthur H. Clark. OCLC 2683160.

David T. Orique (2009). "Journey to the Headwaters: Bartolomé de Las Casas in a Comparative Context". The Catholic Historical Review 95 (1): 1–24.

Parish, Helen Rand; and Harold E. Weidman (1976). "The Correct Birthdate of Bartolomé de las Casas". Hispanic American Historical Review (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, in association with the American Historical Association) 56 (3): 385–403.doi:10.2307/2514372. ISSN 0018-2168. OCLC 1752092.

Pierce, Brian (1992). "Bartolomé de las Casas and Truth: Toward a Spirituality of Solidarity".Spirituality Today 44 (1).

Rand-Parish, Helen (1980). Las Casas as Bishop: A new interpretation based on hisholograph petition in the Hans P. Kraus Collection of Hispanic American Manuscripts.. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

Rand-Parish, Helen; Weidman, Harold (1980). Las Casas en Mexico: Historia y obra desconocidas. Ciudad de Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Rand-Parish, Helen; Gutiérrez, Gustavo (1984). Bartolomé de las Casas: Liberation of the Oppressed. Berkeley.

Rubies, Joan Pau (2007). "Review of Castro, Daniel - Another Face of Empire". The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 58: 767–768.

Saunders, Nicholas J. (2005). Peoples of the Caribbean: An Encyclopedia of Archeology and Traditional Culture. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 1-57607-701-2.OCLC 62090786.

Sullivan, Patrick Francis.(Ed.) (1995). Indian Freedom: The Cause of Bartolomé de las Casas, 1484-1566, A Reader. Kansas City, Missouri: Sheed and Ward.

Tierney, Brian (1997). The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law 1150–1625. Scholar's Press for Emory University. pp. 272–274.

Wagner, Henry Raup; Helen Rand Parish (1967). The Life and Writings of Bartolomé de Las Casas. University of New Mexico Press.

Source:wikipedia